Tickets Available For "The Barrel of A Gun" And MOVE Members Denied Parole

(Tickets for the premier of Tigre Hill's film are now on sale! Go to kimmelcenter.org to purchase. I am not sure yet if I will be in attendance but I do sure wish Tigre and the other folks involved with the film the best of luck.

On another note, a number of MOVE members have been denied parole again this year. I expect the rest to be similarly denied and will keep people informed)



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TIGRE HILL’S “THE BARREL OF A GUN” WILL PREMIERE ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21st AT THE MERRIAM THEATER IN PHILADELPHIA

Tickets on sale Friday, July 16th at www.kimmelcenter.org PHILADELPHIA - (June 3, 2010) –

The premiere of the highly anticipated and controversial film “The Barrel of a Gun” will take place Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM at the Merriam Theater, 250 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA . Filmmaker Tigre Hill says he has uncovered “rare new insight” concerning what he boldly asserts was the premeditated 1981 killing of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner and the subsequent conviction of death-row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal.

Tickets for the premiere will go on sale Friday, July 16th at www.kimmelcenter.orgat two basic price points: $46.99 for general admission and $100 for the VIP ticket, which includes premium seating and entrance to the exclusive after-party at The Irish Pub at 1123 Walnut Street. A portion of the premiere’s proceeds will be donated to the Daniel Faulkner Educational Grant Fund, a 501 (c) 3, which provides educational grants to children whose parents were the victims of violent crimes.

The ticket fees are rich with symbolism, #4699 being Daniel Faulkner’s badge number and the Irish Pub on 12 th being a bar located along Faulkner’s beat and one he would frequent with his buddies post-shift. “ My hope in telling this tragic story, ” says Hill, who started shooting the film in late 2006, “ is to fully examine the events leading up to the early morning of December 9, 1981 and the aftermath in the manner it deserves.”

“The Barrel of a Gun” is causing a stir from Philadelphia to Hollywood to Germany as anti-death penalty activists and Abu-Jamal supporters are already on heightened alert: the U.S. Supreme Court on January 19 vacated a federal appeals court ruling that threw out Abu-Jamal's death sentence because of a confusingly worded verdict instruction that arguably led the jury to a sentence of death over life in prison, and returned the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a new hearing.

Watch Hill’s gripping trailer for “The Barrel of a Gun” at www.youtube.com/thebarrelofagun, follow news about the film on Facebook (Search: The Barrel of a Gun) and on Twitter (@thebarrelofagun). You can also read Philadelphia Magazine’s profile about Tigre Hill and his movie at http://www.phillymag.com/articles/movies_the_gospel_according_to_tigre. ###

Anti-Death Penalty Activists Turn Against Mumia

(The following "confidential" memo was written by key anti-death penalty activists in the United States)


CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM to ECPM
from the US members of the Steering Committee of the WCADP
Involvement of Mumia Abu-Jamal endangers the US coalition
for abolition of the death penalty

ECPM has unilaterally, and over objection, determined to give the Mumia Abu-Jamal case a prominent role in the upcoming 4th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, including the participation of Mr. Abu-Jamal's lawyers and his direct participation by telephone. The US members of the Steering Committee of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty do not agree to this, because it will be counter-productive to our effort to achieve abolition in our country.

The Abu-Jamal case, regardless of its merits, acts as a lightning rod that galvanizes opponents of abolition and neutralizes key constituencies in the cause of abolition. Continuing to give Abu-Jamal focused attention unnecessarily attracts our strongest opponents and alienates coalition partners at a time when we need to build alliances, not foster hatred and enmity.

While Abu-Jamal still attracts some positive attention outside of the United States, it is at a real cost to the US abolition effort. In 1999, the world's largest association of professional law enforcement officers, the Fraternal Order of Police, announced a boycott of organizations and individuals who support Abu-Jamal. Bills have been introduced in both houses of the US federal legislature condemning the naming of streets for Abu-Jamal. The result is that Abu-Jamal, rather than abolition of the death penalty, becomes the issue and the focus of attention. That is dangerously counter-productive to the abolition movement in the US.
The voices of the Innocent, the voices of Victims and the voices of Law Enforcement are the most persuasive factors in changing public opinion and the views of decision-makers (politicians) and opinion leaders (media). Continuing to shine a spotlight on Abu-Jamal, who has had so much public exposure for so many years, threatens to alienate these three most important partnership groups.

The support of law enforcement officials is essential to achieving abolition in the United States. It is essential to the national abolition strategy of US abolition activists and attorneys, that we cultivate the voices of police, prosecutors and law enforcement experts, to support our call for an end to the death penalty. It was key in New Jersey and in New Mexico, it is fundamental to abolition throughout the US, and it will be a primary focus for 2010 and beyond. We have begun to make real progress with police officers and prosecutors speaking out against the death penalty as a failed policy.

«In a national poll released in 2009, the nation's police chiefs ranked the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers did not believe the death penalty acted as a deterrent to murder, and they rated it as one of most inefficient uses of taxpayer dollars in fighting crime .... "

Death Penalty Information Center, The Death Penalty in 2009: Year End Report, December 18,2009. If the 4th World Congress gives Abu-Jamal and his lawyers the focus and attention proposed by ECPM, the US movement for abolition will be exposed to a serious backlash that will directly damage the delicate alliances we are building with essential groups. As international representatives of the US abolition movement, we cannot agree to the involvement of Abu-Jamal or his lawyers in the World Congress beyond attendance.

For these reasons, providing Abu-Jamal the World Congress stage will require us to consider how to distance our programs in order to protect our vital alliances with our key partners and constituencies. To be effective ad- vocates within the US we must and will continue our strategic approach to abolition with our core allies and our evolving partners. Featuring Mr. Abu-Jamal's case as ECPM has proposed presents an unacceptably high risk of fracturing a developing but still fragile alliance with vitally important constituencies - constituencies that can either help our movement reach the goal of abolition or severely hinder our progress.

Elizabeth Zitrin (DPF), Renny Cushing and Kate Lowenstein (MVFHR), Speedy Rice (NACDL), Kristin Houle (TCADP), Juan Matos de Juan (PRBA)

21 December 2009