Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Mumia "Conspiracy" Answered



(The author of the following letter is a long-time Jamal supporter whose role within the "movement" is writing letters to the media touting whatever pro-Jamal propaganda is fashionable at the moment. Prior to this letter, he was writing about how great the disgraced affidavits presented by disgraced attorney Eliot Grossman were. In a letter from a few years back he justified the murder of Officer Faulkner in the following, borderline insane statement:


"If so, wasn't whoever did do the shooting acting in defense of Cook and to stop a crime?"


Unfortunately, various editors at Philly papers are still giving this mulletted, communist, hippie a forum to spew his pseudo-intellectual rubbish. Thankfully, there are people who do are smart enough and sophisticated enough to run roughshod over his nonsense. Their letters follow his.)


Dear Editor,


IT'S A TIMEWORN tactic of those who seek to disparage Mumia Abu-Jamal's claim of innocence to blur his situation with those others charged with or convicted of completely unrelated crimes.


One would think, however, that letter-writer Don Buttenbusch could come up with something more creative than the hackneyed O.J. Simpson comparison. It is neither Mumia's nor his supporters' responsibility to "find the real killer." But in the unlikely event that Buttenbusch sincerely wants to know "Who else could have killed Officer Faulkner?" I'll offer a few suggestions:

Perhaps a more likely possibility is a man named Kenneth Freeman. It is now almost indisputable that Freeman, a friend of Mumia's brother William Cook, was in the car when Cook was stopped by Faulkner on Dec. 9, 1981. The prosecution, which claimed that Cook, Mumia and Faulkner were the only people on the scene, never revealed that on the fallen officer were found driver's ID belonging to Freeman. Cook has confirmed that Freeman was in the car with him that night. Why was this evidence withheld?


Is it plausible to conjecture that, upon witnessing Cook being beaten by Faulkner and Mumia then being shot as he ran toward the scene, Freeman shot Faulkner and fled into the night?
We may never know, as Freeman was found dead the night of the MOVE bombing, and delivered to the hospital naked and bound. Coincidence?

Bob Harris, Philadelphia

Dear Editor,


Bob Harris' Nov. 24 letter tries another untestable theory as to how Officer Danny Faulkner was murdered. We seem to forget that Faulkner was the victim, not Mumia Abu-Jamal. While Mumia has been alive in prison for almost 26 years, Officer Faulkner has been in his grave.
Harris' theory that Kenneth Freeman may have been the shooter is ludicrous. Faulkner was shot in the back at close range by Mumia's gun. Faulkner, while on the ground, shot Mumia at point-blank range, not as he ran toward the scene, as Harris suggests. Simultaneously, Mumia's gun was fired at point-blank range into Faulkner's forehead. The only person who could have shot Faulkner twice at close range and been shot by Faulkner was Mumia.

Wesley (Mumia) Cook did not testify in his defense. His brother, William Cook, an eyewitness, refuses to testify. If I witnessed a murder, and my brother was accused, and I knew he was innocent, I would be the first on the stand to come to his defense.

How come William Cook has never said a word after a quarter-century? My untestable theories: William Cook did it and won't confess, or just won't come out and admit Mumia is Faulkner's killer.
Mike Lawler, Pottstown


(Anti-MOVE blog note. William Cook did supply an affidavit affirming his and Jamal's innocence, however it was so sloppy and ill-conceived that it contradicted Jamal's own statement)


Dear Editor,


Bob Harris has a suggestion on who killed Officer Faulkner: The man in the back seat of Cook's car did it, then ran away. Before he ran, though, he took Mumia's gun, then returned it to Mumia as Mumia sat on the curb where he was found still holding the gun registered in his name. Does that sound about right, Mr. Harris?


If that was truly the case, why didn't Cook or Mumia or anyone else throw that story at someone? I'm sure one of the hundreds of lawyers Mumia's had would have brought that fact up somewhere during the last 25 years. Then you add that this Mr. Freeman was one of the people in the MOVE house that allowed innocent children to die in the bombing by not letting them escape.

Don't bother saying that they would have been shot by police. If that was the case, why were Ramona and Birdie Africa, who escaped on their own and saved by the police, not shot?
I guess, sir, the only thing we really know is your story is full of baloney.

Rus Slawter, Philadelphia

6 Comments:

At 4:33 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

note: both Birdie Africa and Ramona Africa testified that other MOVE members, including two children, escaped the burning house and were last seen by them running down the back alley away from the fire. All three were found later in the burnt rubble. One of the children's charred corpses had buckshot in it.

 
At 5:32 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually several of the corpses, including children, had bullets in them, meaning the cops were shooting at them as they came out of the house. Yeah, pretty f'd up, but doesn't take anything away from MOVE's provocation/initiation of the whole ordeal. Why were those children in the house there in the first place? MOVE kept them there having a pretty good idea of what was about to go down. But "John Africa's" orders meant more to them than those kids' lives.

On another note... I would like to know Tony what you think about Kenneth Freeman's body allegedly turning up naked, cuffed, and in all likelihood murdered the same day as the MOVE bombing. Coincidence? Or could that be another mysterious death surrounding a party in conflict with MOVE?

 
At 11:07 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

MOVE's provocation? They had their family members beaten, their women had their unborn babies kicked out of their stomaches by police, one young infant's skull crushed under a police man's boot, their house attacked and demolished and 9 members put in jail for a crime involving ONE bullet, attacked for saying they have the Right the defend themselves against any more attempted murders..you call that provocation? wait till your pregnant wife has her stomache stomped on by cops..are you going to say she provoked it? MOVE didn't ask to have a fucking bomb dropped on their home. The children were there because it was their HOME. instead why dont you ask why a bomb was dropped in the first place, why were children who escaped shot and then thrown back into the fire? Bullets were found in a child who BOTH BIRDIE and RAMONA claimed to have seen running away from the house down the alley. you people are disgusting filth, i dont know how you can sleep at night after defending what happened.

 
At 2:24 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sir or whomever you are, you don't have a clue. What you post is pure propaganda...not FACTS.

signed,Jon Pisano, someone who's been there. Come on...give me your best shot

 
At 11:54 PM , Anonymous 229 Brigade said...

Whoever posted the pro MOVE comments should get with the 229 Brigade search us out on myspace.
anyone who justifies killing kids is disgusting filth.
See ya at the protest.
-the 229 Brigade

 
At 7:37 PM , Blogger Tony Allen said...

Nobody justified killing kids, except for MOVE, who used those children and virtually ensured they would lose their young lives a result of the actions of the MOVE adults.

The commenter was making the point that if police had this complete devotion to killing MOVE members, that Ramona and Birdie would not have made it out.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Hit Counter
Online Schools