Sunday, May 27, 2007

"New" Witness In Jamal Case Speaks


by Tony Allen

As if the quarter century saga of the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal could get any stranger, enter the story of Pedro Polakoff.

In 1981, Polakoff was a photographer who was just doing his job when he made his way to the scene of Officer Faulkner’s murder in the early hours of a cold December morning.

Today, the pictures he took are central components of the latest propaganda campaign waged by Jamal supporters, chief amongst them is Michael Schiffmann, whose book "Race Against Death. Mumia Abu-Jamal: a Black Revolutionary in White America," contends that Jamal was the victim of a racist frame-up. It is not a new argument, but the pictures used to make the point are new to most people.

Schiffman says that he saw the photos on the internet and made contact with Polakoff. What he does not say is that he first saw them on my website.

Having seen the pictures and the spin Schiffman puts on them, I wanted to talk to the man who was behind the camera way back in 1981.

Thankfully, Mr. Polakoff was generous enough to speak at length with me about his pictures, his interpretation of them, what he knew about that area of Philadelphia at the time, and what he saw and heard during the early morning hours of December 9th, 1981.

There are a couple of things that jumped out at me right away as I spoke with Pedro. The first of which is how adamant he is about his story. The second thing that stood out is just how much Pedro’s story deviates not only from that of the prosecution, but also from the various stories spun by Jamal’s revolving door of defense attorneys over the years.

With that said, I still think Pedro’s story is one worth hearing and writing about. As someone who was at the scene of the crime just minutes after it occurred, his observations should not be dismissed out of hand and deserve to be explored.

Let me get a few things out of the way. Pedro has no discernible political agenda that he wants to espouse. He says he supports the police, but later on in the interview says that he "never had faith in the police of Philadelphia", that he has clear doubts as to the veracity of the judicial system, but has no problem with the death penalty.

Oh, and for two hundred dollars you can look at his pictures of the crime scene.

Until he met Michael Schiffman he believed justice had been served in Faulkner’s case. That is because he believed that Mumia Abu-Jamal was the passenger in Billy Cook’s Volkswagen.
According to Pedro, all of the people he spoke to that night, police included, believed the shooter had been in the passenger seat of Billy Cook’s pulled over car. He claims to have been told by a number of witnesses that Faulkner was shot by the passenger, who had rolled down the window of the passenger side of the VW bug and shot Faulkner in the head, and than rolled out of the car, onto the concrete and than took off running towards the subway. According to these same witnesses, there was another man who was seen crouched in a corner prior to the shooting.

Billy Cook, it was said, never got out of the car until the police removed him and according to Pedro, nobody was talking about Mumia running towards the scene, much less shooting Officer Faulkner, nor was there any mention, according to Pedro, of Jamal being shot.

Pedro arrived at the crime scene around 15 minutes after the shooting, before even the police investigators. He described the situation he observed upon his arrival as a "mess". The scene itself, he claims was compromised before and after it was cordoned off, as various individuals poked around the scene and moved evidence, including Officer Faulkner’s car which was moved by Officers a few feet down the street. Pedro himself, reportedly almost stepped in a pool of blood and told me that "nothing was secured at the scene".

At the scene, Pedro was given complete access to take pictures at the scene, with the police officers asking only that he not take pictures of the deceased Officer Faulkner out of respect, a request that Pedro honored. Aside from that request, he went about his buisness without being hindered in any way from doing his job, and was able to speak freely with the people on the scene, including the Police. One of whom told the photographer that there was a cab driver across the street who had seen the shooting and had identified the shooter.

At some point Pedro became aware of a fracas going on in the police wagon that was parked on the street. He said he heard screaming from the van, but could not discern if anything was being said. Pedro remembers being told that the "guy who shot the cop" was in the van putting up a fight and that the cops were "beating the shit out him". Something that at the time Pedro had no problem with as he had no sympathy for cop-killers. A few minutes later Pedro saw the police van drive off, in no particular hurry, with no lights or sirens blazing.

According to Pedro, 13th and Locust was familiar territory for him. He also makes the claim that it was, along with being a stomping ground for prostitutes, also a known haunt of the Philadelphia mob. He recounted to me seeing one prominent member of Philadelphia’s organized crime community talking it up with a Police Captain at the scene of the crime and he told me that it was well known that the Mob ran a club on that street.

Pedro bristles at the notion that there was damage done to the concrete by shots fired by Jamal. He says that there were no "divots" made in the concrete and when I told him that police investigators did, in fact, make note of such divots, he responded firmly that this was "bullshit". A response from Pedro that I would hear repeatedly as I re-counted trial transcripts to him during our conversation. He also firmly rejects the police contention of bullet strikes at 1234 Locust Street. He says there was no broken glass or any evidence at all of there being any bullet damage done to that door way as police had claimed back in 1982.

In fact, not only is Pedro dismissive of that aspect of the prosecution’s case, but he is dismissive of the ballistics evidence in general. He tells me that it would have been "impossible" for the "Plus P" bullet to have been removed from Faulkner’s skull because of how destructive that kind of bullet is. I ask him how he thinks this fact could have been lost on Jamal’s own ballistics expert and I am told by Pedro that he "hasn’t read much about the case", nor has he read the trial transcripts. But since he has been involved with Michael Schiffman and sold the German author access to his photos, along with producers of a documentary in production about Jamal, Pedro has become certain that Mumia is the victim of an injustice. One that he believes could be mob related.

Schiffman, makes much of the fact that Pedro went on at least two occasions to the District Attorney’s Office with his crime scene photos and was subsequently turned away. What I was surprised to find out was that Pedro had attempted to contact Jamal’s current attorney, Robert Bryan and that Bryan has not returned his calls.

One would think that with all of this hype about "explosive new evidence of how the police framed Mumia", that Bryan would at least have taken an affidavit from Pedro in order to preserve his testimony in legal form, but this has not been the case.

For me, it was interesting to speak with someone who was actually at the scene of the crime that has caused so much controversy and debate over the last quarter of a century. But as I go back through my notes of my conversation with Pedro Polakoff and than compare his perspective with the trial testimony I am left with more questions than answers.

His take on the situation, while certainly favorable for Jamal, also runs counter to much of what has been said in defense of Jamal through the years. Just one example of this is in the affidavits of both Billy Cook and Mumia. If Polakoff is correct, than either Mumia or his brother made erroneous statements in their affidavits as to the events of that awful night. And that is just one example of about a hundred that I could cite.

I am certain about one thing though, and that is the "Mumia wars" will go on for many years to come, this latest episode with the crime scene photos just being the latest chapter of a tragedy that does not seem to have an ending. Those who believe that Jamal was framed will continue to believe this and those who think Jamal a vile cop-killer will continue to push for his execution.


The truth, I am convinced is lodged in the mind of Mumia. It is a truth that we will likely never hear escape his lips.

3 Comments:

At 4:32 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cop with Link to Jamal Frame Up Dies Under Suspicious Circumstances


by Tony Allen and Lori Tetrault

This weekend advocates for controversial death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal will seek to highlight the plight of the prisoner, whose case and writings have propelled him to the forefront of social justice agendas the world over. Central to Jamal's contentions is the overwhelming evidence of gross police misconduct that tainted his prosecution and subsequent appeals. It is perhaps fitting that as Jamal supporters converge from all over the world, the Philadelphia Police Department may once again find itself in yet another scandal....this time due to the events surrounding the death of a police officer who, himself, was involved with the now infamous "frame up" of Mumia Abu-Jamal.

In the beginning, the Nov 13th, 2001 death of Thomas Bray seemed to be nothing more than a tragic end to the celebrated life of a popular and decorated veteran officer. The truth, however, may not be so cut and dry. Bray was a police diver, a notoriously dangerous, and at times grizzly, job. He was a popular cop, was featured on national TV shows, and met President Bush and Clinton. His peers labeled him as aggressive and he had a reputation as a media hound. Much earlier in his career, he was involved in a case that would be catapulted into the world spotlight for it's shocking misconduct on the part of police and prosecutors of Mumia Abu-Jamal.

On the early morning of Dec 9th, 1981, Bray arrived at Jefferson Hospital, where Jamal and slain officer Daniel Faulkner were taken. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Bray testified that as Jamal was being handcuffed to a gurney, had said to Bray "I'm glad. If you let me go I will kill all you cops." This psuedo-confession was purportedly given in addition to the other damning statement that was attributed to Jamal "Yeah I shot the motherf---er and I hope he dies." This supposed confession has been one of the most widely discredited aspects of Jamal's case. The most telling components of the confession fallacy is the length in time it took for police to come up with the confession (two months) and the fact that only police and a security guard who knew the slain officer allegedly heard it. This was in an emergency room full of hospital personnel, none of whom report the gravely wounded Jamal saying anything. The involvement of Bray, a purported "good cop," speaks volumes as to the depths of the depravity of law enforcement with regard to this case and lends credence to the widely held belief that the Philadelphia Police department is and was rife with corruption. Indeed, it's the very same corruption that may have led to the death of Officer Bray.

It seems that Bray may have been a victim of the same corruption that he once sought to perpetuate against Mumia Abu-Jamal. At the time of his death, Bray was involved in a corruption investigation against his former supervisor and had, in that endeavor, worn a "wire." The exact contents of the taped conversations remains unclear, as DA Lynne Abraham has yet to release the tapes to the public; however, the aforementioned supervisor was later charged with four misdemeanor corruption charges: theft, conspiracy, intimidation of witnesses, and obstruction in the administration of law.

Officer Bray was near death when he was brought to the surface of the Delaware River where he had been ensnared, attempting to dislodge a buoy. He died a short time later at University of Penn Hospital of his injuries and asphyxiation. The district attorney, after an investigation, made the assertion that there was no "wrong doing" in the death of Bray. However, the media has uncovered gross procedural errors that may have helped lead to the death of Bray. Whether this train of mistakes were simply that, or were of a more deliberate and sinister nature, remains to be seen.

What exactly happened to Officer Bray will likely never be known. Bray, who likely was going along with the "team" in 1981 when he fraudulently attributed incendiary statements to Jamal, may have suffered the penalty for going against the grain in a police department that has long been known to be one of the most brutal and corrupt in the nation. Whether as a "good cop" or as a result of saving his own skin, the allegations that Officer Daniel Faulkner was killed for interfering with police corruption and other criminal activities sets a precedent for what may have also happened to Officer Bray. Many dismiss this as mere coincidence or as works of fiction, but the growing number of these cases seems more to be exposing a widespread plague rather than there being rare occurrences.

 
At 4:46 AM , Anonymous Pedro P. Polakoff III said...

Let's stick straight to the facts here.

#1. As a photographer I own the copyright to my images, and as such anyone who is going to publish those photo's or use them, in any manner, MUST pay me for a license to do so. You & your website included. The papers purchased the photos from me in Dec. 1981 at standard freelance rates based on the pages the photos ran in and number of times run. Schiffmann & a movie company have both purchased a limited license to use the photos as well. I offered to show you the photos, here in my home, for free, and advised that to give you electronic copies or prints for review would involve a licensing fee.

#2. I did not state that a +P could not have been removed from Faulkner's skull. I stated that a +P, fired into a human skull at point-blank range (from a position standing over a prone person) would have exploded the back of the skull scattering blood & brain material onto the pavement and that my photo's show a very 'clean' blood trail and NO damage to the surrounding cement as would have occurred if shots had missed and impacted the ground. I also stated that as a former owner of a Charter Arms .38 special that I knew the gun was incapable of handling +P ammo and would either A) explode / crack or B) jump out of the hand from the recoile & poor grip design. I myself having had my thumb severly injured while firing a load that was only slightly 'heavy' and nowhere near the power of a +P.

#3. My photo's (there are a total of 26) show a lot more than the few that are being used currently by yourself & Mumia supporters. It's not for me to decide guilt or innocence, but photographic facts & my memories of the night differ greatly from what I have been (now) told about the case.

#4. I did not visit the DA's office, I called them in 1981 and also in 1992? Both times they never returned my phone call.

#5. The same (no return call) is the case with the current defense counsel.

#6. 'Moving back to your car' is quite different then 'Move your car back' and the photo's taken as I arrived on the scene do not show anything behind Faulkner's cruiser which is where the witness's Cab was reported to have been parked.

#7. My photo's show the police officer's hands on the metal parts of the guns. In fact they show that he changed hands at least one time during the 30+ minutes he was holding them.

#8. My photo's show no broken glass or damage to the door frame @ 1234 Locust street, and that's at 400% enlargement where I can see the grain in the wood through the paint.

#9. My photo's show high-level uniformed officers on the scene before it was even secured and before the arrival of the crime lab. I have been advised that this is also contradictory to the testimony given (which I still refuse to read as I will not alter or bias my memories of the night by doing so)

As I stated when I agreed to speak with you, do not alter or bias the facts to suit your own agenda. It's the same thing I've told anyone else who has spoken with me, or reviewed/used the photos.

A police officer was killed, and his murderer should be fried. Our judicial system requires that guilt be proven beyond 'reasonable doubt'. Perhaps they did get the right man, perhaps not, but it is now appearing that there was clear tampering of the evidence in order to make a 'rock solid' case and that, in it's own right, is an injustice to both the accused and his victim.

 
At 1:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

you are wrong on a couple points> I also fired +p ammo from a charter arms and a smith and wesson snub and a 357. The kick did nothing to the smaller guns except stronger recoil. Plus P ammo has a tendency to shatter on impact. As to you not reading the facts, the 2 Stakeout Officers, who were my co-workers and who I would trust with my life, arrested the murderer Mumia SECONDS after the killing. The case was/is "rock solid" If you think injustice was done how would you explain the OVERWHELMING review by local, state and Federal courts who found NO wrong doing...affirmed guilt..."rock solid". How would you explain the MANY defense fabrications (Beverly comes to mind for one). All new defense Lawyers...all new stories..all new bull shmidt

John Pisano
Stakeout Unit
Retired

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Hit Counter
Online Schools